Most B2B marketing teams appear to be experimenting, rather than heavily investing. Sure, they have a Twitter account, and may have put up a blog and even a Facebook fan page, but the level of investment falls far shy of the amounts we invest in Google search campaigns, trade shows or sponsorships. Why is this?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26f0b/26f0b842737eaac59d12b3924cb2c28f29397dd6" alt=""
The most significant challenge in making comparable investments is in the way that investments are made and pay off. With most typical marketing investments, a “lightning strike” pattern is what is seen. A big investment is made, and a big payoff is realized. We run a large campaign, attend a major show or increase our investment in search ad spending, and we see the results immediately.
However, with social media, investments follow a “flywheel” pattern. Over time a steady pattern of investments builds more of a “presence” in social media, a community of interested participants and relationships with key influencers. The building of this “asset” takes significant time and effort – often years – but once it is built it pays off tremendously in terms of awareness, interest and lead flow.
Budgets and Planning
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88909/889093b273d9616a5178696534fe6d180457b4ae" alt=""
Other departments have found ways to model, value, and plan for investments that pay off in the long run, but not in a short-term budget. Today’s CMOs must tackle this budgeting and planning challenge if they are to correctly prioritize the marketing investments we must make between those with short-term, “lightning strike” patterns of investment and long-term, “flywheel” patterns such as social media.
(this article first appeared as a guest post on ZoomInfo's "Follow the Lead" blog)
0 comments:
Post a Comment