![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqnhOyGtymuAqTM3VT5hS3asARoFDrhIpwLYA1FDxRDdGzBycJqfdae5R-fzW5fN0SykvFWIM2zHWRfUlp5WJfzw7vA-UHNV0k-OYnQ-XLBQo5YpR6WhJ0gJ0_PVyvp6r819CP78q43_Q7/s400/ApollosArrow.jpg)
In predicting the weather, for example, a three dimensional grid of temperature, pressure, and humidity values is constructed as a starting point. From here, various computer models attempt to forecast how weather patterns, temperatures, rain, and wind will occur. The resulting predictions (unfortunately still very inaccurate) are challenged by both the inaccuracy of the starting points and the model used to predict an outcome.
Interestingly, an individual model can vary greatly in its ability to predict different outcomes. Temperature may be relatively well predicted, but rain may be no better than guesswork.
In reading the book, I was reminded of marketers' challenges in using lead scoring to predict which leads are good enough to be passed to sales. We have similar elements; the underlying data - in our case digital body language - on the prospect's activities, and the model we use to score leads and determine which is a qualified lead.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjU5qrxn2I_ZZXZMMcsuG2PKnZsCO0hLsUxNSQoYwcLw_rdQu8LXlfn2OIFnAVEv2dYmkl42aIGodTk5h7T6YQy8rIEhETdBt9CrUQdxmwJOkO_ULjorlydXci1Ahl7c9nwmhBDkOALeSqO/s400/Top50Companies.jpg)
If you see multiple visitors on your website from one company, they are doing deep investigation, and are using compelling search terms when finding you on Google, you know that there has likely been an internal event at that organization that has caused a group to begin investigating your solutions.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV1SrYQIzQt9p1xU-WZd77lItGjiP8ph0ppPJulSWjlkbhI6XVGJJA1wWPsAqP_8hj1DKlp0Tn9BnfSRGgV6pO1w0-Q-1YC_AlD2yIyEfiz4qb_N941CP2rG5TFaKjLVZIkMKsyh8ZQ22k/s400/CRM_TrafficLight.jpg)
However, if you don't know the key individuals who would be the decision makers on a purchase of your solutions, you can focus your efforts on what you do know - that a buying process is under way at that organization. Knowing that, a role-based discovery service such as Reachforce can easily capture the names you require and get your sales team in touch with them.
Much like predicting the weather, predicting buying behavior can be challenging and imprecise. However, even being able to predict key indicators like the fact that a buying process is underway at a specific organization adds tremendous value to your sales team.
2 comments:
Steven:
Some interesting insights on leveraging customized CRM dashboard intelligence to monitor -- and ideally drive -- prospect behavior. In that vein, I was interested in your take on the following new Demand Gen report assessment, if you didn't already see it:
"The fact that customers find they're "currently using 50% or less of their marketing automation system’s functionality" should also be a wake-up call for vendors to help their customers take advantage of the system's capabilities as they gain proficiency."
Brian,
it's an interesting perspective; and I would agree that the transition in marketing from a philosophy of outbound (batch & blast) marketing to one of understanding the prospective buyer and responding to their interests is not a quick or simple transition. Anyone with a message that "technology alone will solve the problem" should be regarded with quite a bit of suspicion.
At Eloqua, one of our biggest successes of the last few years has been the investments we've made in the people/process elements to get marketers up to speed, scoring leads, handing them to sales, and nurturing those not yet ready - all in a 3 day (intense) SmartStart. In that case it was the people/process investments more than anything that made the big difference.
Great point though Brian, as it's a key thing for the industry to be wrestling with.
Post a Comment